The original article was published in RIA Novosti
*
Again there was a heinous crime. Around 14:30 last Monday, a suicide bomber detonated a bomb in the arrival hall of the international airport Domodedovo. Terrorist attack, which occurred after the visit of Russian president to the Middle East and on the eve of an international summit in Davos, was clearly intended as a weakening Russian authorities, and on to cause concern to the international community as a methyl foreigners. The result of the heavy: 35 people died and 180 were injured. As it became known that Russia could finish in 2010 is even worse, since a suicide bomber from the airport was linked to terrorist cells, identified and liquidation, which had planned the explosion at the Red Square in the evening on December 31.
Even in this difficult moment, Russia has still not eligible for support, but only the abundance of criticism. Particularly noteworthy is the French press, which once again distinguished itself. For example, according to Helene Blanc from France-Info, you have to be careful because, she says to us, referring to a series of terrorist attacks in 1999 in Russia, which killed 293 people: "These attacks were not the work of Chechens, which they were assigned, but the work of the FSB. Anne Nivat believes that "Putin, Medvedev and exploit the obsession with security, to win elections and be elected thanks to its rhetoric on Chechnya. " For Le Figaro correspondent in Russia Pierre Avril, the country became a victim of civil war. " Finally, Vincent Zhover believes attack showed a "failure of Putin." This statement has not given us rest this summer, when fires have occurred in Russia, allegedly demonstrated the collapse of a hypothetical system of Putin. Besides, he adds: "corrupt and incompetent, the security services have not identified the suicide bomber."
Nevertheless, far from the editorial in the posh neighborhoods of Moscow or Paris, on the battlefield, the results of Russia in the fight against terrorism, speak for themselves. Only in 2010 in the North Caucasus was killed 301 terrorists and 468 arrested, held 4.500 raids and 50 major anti-terrorist operations. 66 terrorist attacks were prevented, although the 500 terrorist attacks (including 92 explosions and attacks) cost the lives of 600 people. In Russia only in 2010 more than 360 police officers were killed while performing official responsibilities.
Of course, the Muslim Caucasus, headed by Chechnya's debt represents the Western media as the region occupied by the tyrannical Russia, but striving for independence and freedom. Terrorism in the Caucasus is supposedly a kind of desperate reaction of the oppressed peoples. The French, with nostalgia Gallic inhabitants of the village, besieged the mighty Rome and misguided about the reality on the ground, allowed to introduce myself misleading, at least most of them. However, it is not so. The aim of terrorists is not the liberation of oppressed peoples and their enslavement. Terrorists of the Caucasus under the influence of foreign Islamists, the Wahhabis, proponents of the revolutionary and destructive ideology that seeks to to establish an Islamic emirate in the region. This is the core of the Wahhabi probably has its roots in the first Chechen war, when many foreigners (Arabs, Afghans ...) Adhered to the Chechens, hoping to transform the war for independence in the religious conflict in the region and start a holy war. It is known that occurred, although the Chechen nationalists lost the war of the federal army, but, ultimately, have broad autonomy for Chechnya, political and religious, within the federation. Tensions between Caucasians and foreigners, one exploded, the first difficulty recognized methods of second and their distant of Sufism Caucasus intransigent radicalism, poorly adapted to local traditions. Ramzan Kadyrov has also recently announced that is symbolic of the defeat Wahhabism in Chechnya.
Branch of the Caucasus from Russia, as would the Wahhabis and some foreign intellectuals, not the solution. It seems obvious that the very first consequence of such a decision would be that the region would be given to internal conflicts, with the likelihood that he soon would become a hotbed of terrorism. It must be remembered that these regions of southern Russia are for the most part Russian longer than Nice - France. Finally, many Caucasian Muslims regard themselves as Russians and as citizens of the Federation, one of the faces of multicultural identity, which they are.
was would be nice to foreign commentators have focused their attacks and energy on criminals, not the Russian state. As far as I know, from Madrid to London or Moscow, the victims are the victims of the same terrorism. I do not think that when these events happened in other European democracies, like Spain or England, in 2004 and 2005, I could read in Russian commentators, that the attacks signified the failure of the governments of these countries or that the security services ill do my job. For the simple reason that it is practically impossible to prevent all acts of terrorism. The Spaniards, Israelis, Turks, or Indians, whose countries are often the targets of terrorism, have long understood the need for draconian security measures to prevent the majority of attacks, with more or less success. These measures, even if they restrict some of his personal liberty, are, of course, essential to life could to follow the peaceful course, despite the threats.
mood prepared, if new attacks will happen in Russia, and possibly again in the capital, which, alas, seems inevitable. The aim of terrorists is always intimidating the population and destabilize the society. But we are Russian citizens and foreigners, in no case should not allow themselves to destabilize. In contrast, only the coordination of conscious and decisive state, with a cohesive and caring people is the best bulwark against terrorism.
Russia is able to overcome these difficulties. As aptly summed up Alex Pimanov, host of "The Man and the Law "in the latest issue, devoted to these events:" Those who spontaneously and voluntarily offered their help after the attack, who were taken for free from the airport to the subway passengers, those who gave their blood and came to the rescue in the first difficult moments are the real Russia. "
Even in this difficult moment, Russia has still not eligible for support, but only the abundance of criticism. Particularly noteworthy is the French press, which once again distinguished itself. For example, according to Helene Blanc from France-Info, you have to be careful because, she says to us, referring to a series of terrorist attacks in 1999 in Russia, which killed 293 people: "These attacks were not the work of Chechens, which they were assigned, but the work of the FSB. Anne Nivat believes that "Putin, Medvedev and exploit the obsession with security, to win elections and be elected thanks to its rhetoric on Chechnya. " For Le Figaro correspondent in Russia Pierre Avril, the country became a victim of civil war. " Finally, Vincent Zhover believes attack showed a "failure of Putin." This statement has not given us rest this summer, when fires have occurred in Russia, allegedly demonstrated the collapse of a hypothetical system of Putin. Besides, he adds: "corrupt and incompetent, the security services have not identified the suicide bomber."
Nevertheless, far from the editorial in the posh neighborhoods of Moscow or Paris, on the battlefield, the results of Russia in the fight against terrorism, speak for themselves. Only in 2010 in the North Caucasus was killed 301 terrorists and 468 arrested, held 4.500 raids and 50 major anti-terrorist operations. 66 terrorist attacks were prevented, although the 500 terrorist attacks (including 92 explosions and attacks) cost the lives of 600 people. In Russia only in 2010 more than 360 police officers were killed while performing official responsibilities.
Of course, the Muslim Caucasus, headed by Chechnya's debt represents the Western media as the region occupied by the tyrannical Russia, but striving for independence and freedom. Terrorism in the Caucasus is supposedly a kind of desperate reaction of the oppressed peoples. The French, with nostalgia Gallic inhabitants of the village, besieged the mighty Rome and misguided about the reality on the ground, allowed to introduce myself misleading, at least most of them. However, it is not so. The aim of terrorists is not the liberation of oppressed peoples and their enslavement. Terrorists of the Caucasus under the influence of foreign Islamists, the Wahhabis, proponents of the revolutionary and destructive ideology that seeks to to establish an Islamic emirate in the region. This is the core of the Wahhabi probably has its roots in the first Chechen war, when many foreigners (Arabs, Afghans ...) Adhered to the Chechens, hoping to transform the war for independence in the religious conflict in the region and start a holy war. It is known that occurred, although the Chechen nationalists lost the war of the federal army, but, ultimately, have broad autonomy for Chechnya, political and religious, within the federation. Tensions between Caucasians and foreigners, one exploded, the first difficulty recognized methods of second and their distant of Sufism Caucasus intransigent radicalism, poorly adapted to local traditions. Ramzan Kadyrov has also recently announced that is symbolic of the defeat Wahhabism in Chechnya.
Branch of the Caucasus from Russia, as would the Wahhabis and some foreign intellectuals, not the solution. It seems obvious that the very first consequence of such a decision would be that the region would be given to internal conflicts, with the likelihood that he soon would become a hotbed of terrorism. It must be remembered that these regions of southern Russia are for the most part Russian longer than Nice - France. Finally, many Caucasian Muslims regard themselves as Russians and as citizens of the Federation, one of the faces of multicultural identity, which they are.
was would be nice to foreign commentators have focused their attacks and energy on criminals, not the Russian state. As far as I know, from Madrid to London or Moscow, the victims are the victims of the same terrorism. I do not think that when these events happened in other European democracies, like Spain or England, in 2004 and 2005, I could read in Russian commentators, that the attacks signified the failure of the governments of these countries or that the security services ill do my job. For the simple reason that it is practically impossible to prevent all acts of terrorism. The Spaniards, Israelis, Turks, or Indians, whose countries are often the targets of terrorism, have long understood the need for draconian security measures to prevent the majority of attacks, with more or less success. These measures, even if they restrict some of his personal liberty, are, of course, essential to life could to follow the peaceful course, despite the threats.
mood prepared, if new attacks will happen in Russia, and possibly again in the capital, which, alas, seems inevitable. The aim of terrorists is always intimidating the population and destabilize the society. But we are Russian citizens and foreigners, in no case should not allow themselves to destabilize. In contrast, only the coordination of conscious and decisive state, with a cohesive and caring people is the best bulwark against terrorism.
Russia is able to overcome these difficulties. As aptly summed up Alex Pimanov, host of "The Man and the Law "in the latest issue, devoted to these events:" Those who spontaneously and voluntarily offered their help after the attack, who were taken for free from the airport to the subway passengers, those who gave their blood and came to the rescue in the first difficult moments are the real Russia. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment