Alcoholic Swollen Ankles

Destruction the west by the Zionist ideology,

Have you noticed? Plus they'll talk about democracy and it is violated. They talk to you more freedom and more laws are fascisent. They talk to you more separation Justice and politicians and the power has control over. For proof, Europe has not put in France for its "political justice".

As for the French finance ... it announced the death of our most vulnerable citizens. The bourgeoisie will lose weight, and larger-the nobility, these financial and these politicians will s'engrosser-point of the pick have to eat to lose weight.

How do you explain that Europe, as rich as it is, is engaged in an economic disaster that will engulf practically all countries, but also cause damage to civilians without touching the politicians?

They are so eager that they have passed laws against retreats very quickly. Many people will have to work beyond age 65, and for others, retirement will be affected after their death. The measures taken by the regime sarkoiste, are illegal and undemocratic. If democracy, their beloved democracy is to say no to people, that they do they stay?
All contributions for over half a century have been swallowed in their finances and their scam to Madoff. It is quite normal: we have only Madoff and Sarko in pension funds ...

Money everyone believed in safety in the hands of the state, was simply squandered in financial transactions, and for large groups (mostly) friends of political leaders ... The U.S. pension funds have defrauded millions of people, elderly. They want to do the same thing in France and other European countries. Americans have not even had time to withdraw their own money before the finance and banking swallowing.

Americans have not only defrauded their own, but now we will pay for all of us, their debts. They ate their bread, and now they want to eat that which was funded by pennies.

Argentina was a test American Zionist size. They are doing it with Europe. They emptied the accounts of Greece and put it under trusteeship ... then Ireland will ... Portugal, and Spain, which is involved in the Portuguese banks ... then France has invested over 255 billion euros, Germany and will then ...

Meanwhile ... England and America will create tickets as if it rolls of paper toilets, and will continue again and again to pay the debts of the Anglo-Saxon ... banks majority owned by Zionist Jews.

To understand who is behind the Fed, simply look for the few banks that have thrived on patterns Madoff ... the biggest crook and thief of the two centuries

So behind the Fed:

• Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin (Berlin would like).

• Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris

• Israel Moses Sieff Banks of Italy

• Banks Khan Loeb New York

• Banks Goldman Sachs etc etc ...

Not only do these people control all U.S. banks, but also citizens and U.S. policy. And by extension, European banks are involved in graft and international fraud.

Since the founding of the Fed, and therefore control yankistan by Zionist Jews, the world has never been at peace. Just listen to the speech on peace in Palestine. Peace will never be valid until the Zionists have control of international finance.

Zionist Jews created a system to live at our expense ... they create crises for better starve, then build and strengthen their ideology under the threat of international terrorism. Evidence that the Zionists are involved in terrorism, no doubt, unless an idiot propagandist: Karachi, the plane test flights to Namibia from Germany, Sept. 11, which defies all laws of physics ...

Can People With Asma Takebenzonatate

The diplomatic documents revealed by Wikileaks confirm American concerns regarding the recent Turkish diplomatic policy.


U.S. diplomatic documents, which have just been made available by Wikileaks, the site analysis and strategic policy which specializes in the distribution of leakage, confirmed that the U.S. is concerned about the turn taken by the Turkish foreign policy today. Recall that, particularly since the beginning of his second term, the AKP government is developing a new diplomacy is very active in his regional area, leading many observers to suggest a shift in focus and a tendency to turn to the East.

Since 28 November, the Turkish press dissects so anything that can relate to Turkey and its leaders, in telegrams U.S. diplomatic updated. These show particularly severe criticism of Ankara's policy towards Israel and Iran. The foreign policy of the AKP government is particularly regarded as "neo-Ottoman" and telegrams show that U.S. officials increasingly squeezed out of the diplomatic guidance of Ankara. These revelations, however, are not really a surprise, as the U.S. administration showed its displeasure or exasperation, against Turkish initiatives in foreign policy, in recent months. We remember that in April 2010, shortly after the nuclear summit in Washington, the mood of the encounter between Barack Obama and Recep Tayyip Erdogan on the sidelines of the G20 meeting in Toronto, was described as "frosty" by the media, and only a few weeks later, Hillary Clinton had publicly thrashed the tripartite agreement signed by Iran, Brazil and Turkey, who wanted an alternative to sanctions that the United States prepared against Tehran.

Wikileaks's revelations are probably more interesting when they show the perception that those responsible American Turkish political changes underway. Thus, analyzing the foreign policy of the AKP, former U.S. ambassador to Ankara, James Jeffrey, said she is "increasingly focused on the Muslim world and Islamic traditions," but this does not mean that Turkey "will give up or abandon its traditional alliance with the West ...." The same analysis ambassador realizes that made his Israeli counterpart, the deterioration of his country's relations with Turkey. According to this analysis, the cause of the dispute between Turkey and Israel held the first Turkish prime minister, accused of being a "religiously fundamentalist who hates us" an opinion that James Jeffrey said after finally share have discussed both inside and outside government. Is also observed that the U.S. ambassador considers that "despite its success, the Turkish foreign policy has ambitions of Rolls Royce, but it has only the resources of a Rover," and he doubts the Turkey's capacity to pose as a rival to the EU in the Balkans, Russia or the Caucasus on the Black Sea, and even the Saudis, Egyptians and Iranians in the Middle East. "

Beyond these geopolitical considerations, the U.S. diplomatic telegrams deliver, as appropriate, their share of jokes and small quips. Thus, Recep Tayyip Erdogan described as a character with "overbearing pride" and "limitless ambition", and Abdullah Gul as "someone who has a vision much larger international anti-Western" that the Turkish prime minister. Most controversial and likely to cause a stir, are the remarks of U.S. officials who reported, for example, that the defense minister, Vecdi Gonul, Ahmet Davutoğlu would have spoken, Minister of Foreign Affairs, as a "dangerous individual" and that General Ergin Saygun, then number two in the Turkish army would have found that if the army had wanted to leave their tanks in the street after the first round of the 2007 presidential, she could have done .... More than the tensions between Ankara and Washington, the leakage of Wikileaks could well inflame political conflicts between Turkey and Turkish ...
JM

How To Hack Poptropica Credits With Cheat Engine

birth of Jesus Matthew 1:18-25 - birth of the world-December 19, 2010 Matthew 11:2-11

18 Here's how came the birth of Jesus Christ. His mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before their marriage, she became pregnant by the fact of the Holy Spirit. 19 Joseph her husband, who was right and who would not denounce it publicly, decided to divorce her secretly. 20 while he thought the angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream saying, Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary your wife, because the child it conceived of the Holy Spirit comes; 21 she will give birth to a son, and thou shalt call his name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins. 22 All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet:

23 The virgin shall conceive, she will give birth a son

and we call his name Emmanuel,

which translates: God with us . 24 Upon waking, Joseph did as the angel of the Lord commanded him and took his wife home. 25 But he had no relations with her until she had given birth to a son, whom he called his name Jesus.

There are timeless time. It is a story out of history. It is an adventure inaccessible. This is the story of the straw that first begins to vibrate in life that will manifest in the universe. Put yourself in God's place and try to think about the state of mind which happened to be his. The emergence of life in the universe was probably for him a moment of great emotion, similar to the one he felt when Jesus came into the world bearing in his genes the whole mystery of the incarnation. Billions of years before the birth of Jesus something had occurred somewhere in the waters, in the heart the planet was not yet the earth and life arose.

was an appearance, something indefinable, a protozoan, perhaps, who first began to divide the interior and became living matter. The event has never been told and there were no witnesses. We only know it took place. We know that after the crash that produced the stunning shock wave that caused the birth of the world, the Creator held his breath for the vibration which spread did not destroy it had in mind to see.

Thus, we are told that there was evening and there was morning, it was the third day, and nobody was there to contemplate this wonder, if not God himself. The Creator who opened the history of the universe by the roar of the big bang, which one can not imagine the power, suspending her breath to contemplate a drop of water trembling of life was being put to exist.

The same miracle of life which arises where it seems impossible actualized every year at this same time when the world suspends the course of its activities to evoke the mystery of Christmas. Once again we reiterate to each other than the fragile reality that is life is inhabited by God. We relive the same still wonder this unique moment when God mixes his divinity to humanity, as once he had mixed his creative inspiration to the onset of DNA that had step by step completed Earth all forms that life can take.

dint of science and of patience, bent over their instruments and on their computers, people have found traces of the history of life flowing in a drop of water. With their findings, instead of thanking the Creator, they took the big head. They believed that having discovered the secrets of the origin of life, they became masters of life. Not only have they continued to dispose as they please, they have continued to delete where it bothered them. They sought to submit to their will, they attacked its transmission and reproduction . They believe they can still evolve life as they please without worrying about God. Yet they have doubts.

contemplating God is not all that surprised. He knows that the drop who first brought the seeds of life were this claim of the living creature to supplant its creator. The human genius that was going to boil the evening of the sixth day of creation was already designed by God to rebel against his God to find in the performance of his rebellion towards his destiny. Indeed, in the spirit of God all made sense and coherence.

He 's now seemed necessary to return so far in the past because he had to remember that no in the history of world events more important that the history of this first drop and the story of the birth of Jesus. One follows the other for billions of years apart. The world was implementing what God had decided. At first it was cause gushing life in the universe and in a second time it was for God to come and settle in the heart of mankind. All these complicated things, the Bible we repeated with a naive simplicity in the narratives of the nativity.

- All we are told about the plan of God who comes live humanity. It the story of the virgin mother who we become aware.

- Everything we said about the fragility of existence and the death threats hanging over the fledgling life. is what we discover in the behavior King Herod's soldiers weapon to kill a child. He confirms by his gesture the arrogance of those who arrived at the pinnacle of power the confiscate for their benefit.

- All we are told battles waged by men to God to deprive him of his secrets. We repérons contemplating Jerusalem scholars who consult the writings compulsent the Torah, the Writings check to identify that God chose the little town of Bethlehem to incarnate

- All we are told of the quiet assurance with which God controls the hostile powers and defeats the evil behavior. This is why angels come into action, that Joseph listens and obeys and everything goes according to what had been said.

- Everything we said about the hope offered to all men. Magi and shepherds, all are there to hear and report everything that mankind is entitled to expect.

Despite this, the world continues to operate as if this story was a fiction , and as if the Christmas story was a fairy tale. We find it hard to understand that God is the most intimate of human reality to transform it into a divine reality. We can not believe that God intervening in human transformed our destiny forever and we find it hard to believe that eternity is now part of our future. We find it hard to accept that our destiny is not tied to promises of a unlimited human progress but the certainty that God dwells in our lives today. If we do not know not what this mystery we must realize that however is the culmination of creation and that God intended us to be concerned. Everything takes place in both events in which God creates life and then when he himself comes to live life.

A child born at Christmas is the child of a day. It causes our emotions and makes us aware of our vulnerability. We understand the contact history so that the sheep around him in the fold are harmless, however, there are wolves out there who look like Herod to feed on the lives of others. The world is a world of competing powers, the losers and winners disappear become stronger, but disappear in turn defeated by stronger than them. It is the law of its kind. But God does not resign it.

While we seek the truth must be sought elsewhere than in the highlights of the history of mankind. Revealing himself in a child that God teaches us the truth remains invisible to the powerful and that even scientists do not see it. The child grew and the truth about God has become more relevant as he grew and he taught.

We discover in what he said God laid in all men, a ferment of eternity. It can only develop if the Safety of Life takes precedence over all human activities. It is valuing the lives of those with whom we interact that eternity can arise in us, a subtle osmosis between God and us. Eternity is not an abstract value to which we can hold forth baseless. She is one of hope and we can not access if we receive of God when it connects us with our fellows. To enter in eternity, so we have two partners, God and our brothers in humanity.

As in the aftermath of the Big Bang, God observes humanity and watch evolve. Everything now depends for each of us the approach he has for his neighbor. If it operates and seeks to dominate, despite appearances of its existence is meaningless. It will risk missing out on for eternity without realizing it. For it is against the interest in his own life by showcasing the lives of others, it will jump feet first into eternity without even knowing it .. Appearances are so deceptive, illusory success, what matters to God is that contact with the child born at Christmas our lives identify with his point that eternity that s is acquired becomes our eternity.

Non-warrantable Condo Ma

But why so many terrorist attacks (failed) in the West?

It appears that a terrorist attack was foiled in a plane to Germany! Do you know why: Germany and now ... not a year or a year ago! ... It is because of Ireland. According to you there is no relationship? You'll quickly understand why.

Germany, specifically the German leaders, trembling with fear, not face a terrorist attack, but because of the refusal of Ireland to be rescued. Terrorists are invisible in the hold ... and then finally, was a test: for the German banks are exposed to the tune of 206 billion euros in Ireland.

This rescue of Ireland will require the German company to tighten their belts sharply. They will not eat sausage dry in the morning. It simply means that there will be a great wave of austerity for the Germans imposed by the IMF and Europe ...

It's not over. It also remains to save Spain: since Germany is also involved at 250 billion euros. It is perhaps the explanation of the military who are beginning to show in the streets.

Not only the Zionists geobells apply the book to the letter to dispossess the people of Europe, but we also have even more control over our currency. This implies a debt that will impoverish the people until appear to famine in the heart of Europe.

In Ireland it is every man for himself: all persons who strongly debtors and it still means to escape, fled. That exodus Irish

http://www.la-chronique-agora.com/articles/20101126-3214.html

The fiction of the terrorist attack comes just before the announcement of a large austerity plan. And to protect the good little German people, the police are involved: mainly to prevent a riot or demonstrations of anger of the German people.

For all the famous bomb ... media had ensured that the bomb came from Namibia ... then Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere was forced to retract his statement and say that was a test. However, television had photos of the craft kits for the perfect little terrorist

... In reality, the hard budget already announced in June 2010 will be even more severe after the rescue of banks and the Irish state and than that of Spain:

http://www.latribune.fr/actualites/economie/international/20100607trib000517045/l-allemagne-veut-economiser-86-milliards-d-euros-d-ici-2014.html

The European economy has been trapped, with the complicity of our policies, the abandonment of national currencies, but also by the fact forcing the French and Irish people on this fascist European constitution which will serve the interests ussionistes.

For this, we still wonder how a small Zionist entity, which has no income, or GDP, and even fewer boundaries or production, can continue to construct buildings in Palestine? You always ask how can they do ....

They live on the indebtedness of Western, as do Yankee. Attali's why demand a debt of Europe. I found for you some key phrases of the Attali report, and you will find that they have become mad:

"Our ambition for France is not only see our country survive this crisis, but that every French person can give of his best opportunities and access for himself and for his children. Our ambition is that our economy more competitive, freer, more confident and secure and that the country makes the most of global growth. "

" Economy Competitive "does not mean ... it is rather prosperous competitive and therefore free of any morality or law ... demanding" the country that takes advantage of growth "is an admission that we are embedded in the globalization ... the total loss of our correctional and economic control.

Before the economy is our ability to control our army which was released in favor of the Yankees. His first emergency

to balance the books (mostly emptied by the friends of Attali and Sarkozy) is a total austerity with higher taxes, reduced public services, the use of electronic administrative, universities, hospitals, the abolition of tax loopholes and social ... all this without the benefits of richer as the ISF or the tax shield.

This is called fairness for Attali.

He advocated by a deterioration of public accounts in 2011, and therefore additional measures ... new taxes on certain dishes: the environment, wealth and consumption ... it simply means that VAT or other taxes will be added. Goods will be taxed more: as now the mere use of a well or a carbon tax required for people to fill the gaps.

And many more ... report attali

here's what the newspaper says latimes on the case of terrorism test sent by the Yankees ... and the state policeman who follows: http://www.lepoint.fr/monde/quand-les-americains-envoient-des-fausses-bombes-en-allemagne-19-11-2010-1264564_24.php

Itchy Urinary Opening

Art thou he that should come? Sunday, December 12, 2010 Matthew 3:1-12

2 Now John, in prison, had heard of the works of Christ. And he sent word by his disciples 3 Art thou he that should come or do we look for another? 4 Jesus answered them: Go and tell John what you hear and see: 5 The blind receive sight, the lame walk, lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead rise and the good news preached to the poor.

6 Blessed is he who I will not be a stumbling block! On their departure, he began to speak to the crowds, 7 about John: What did you go look at the desert? A reed shaken by the wind? 8 But what did you go see? A man dressed in sumptuous? But those who wear clothes are sumptuous in the houses of kings. 9 What did you go out (to)? See a prophet? Yes, I tell you, and more than a prophet. 10 For this is he whom it is written: Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, to prepare thy way before thee. 11 Verily I say unto you, among those born of women there did not do more survey Jean-Baptiste. Yet the least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.

By JB Tiepolo

irresistibly We approach this Christmas season when the world, gives himself to hope. We hope time of night, that all the promises of the prophets will come true. Then the darkness that surrounds us seems thinner and that a guide star comes surely not strange travelers. They come to the front of the world's stage happily abandon fortune and power while night closes on forgetting their passage. Everything happens as if renouncing fame, fortune and prestige could be simply and naturally. While filling us with hope, this evocation of the passage of the Magi allows us to think that all things that we disagree in this world could be improved if we put a little goodwill. Our hearts are too hard are touched then, and our soul prepares for his God.

But do not burn steps. Reading this day we moved to cross the footsteps of John the Baptist invites us to share his anger against those who conduct their lives against the grain of what God wants.

The character of John the Baptist says is fascinating. We join him in prison where he raises fundamental questions of his life. He questioned Jesus and asked whether it was him who was coming to allow men to be closer to God. He wonders if he will meet his expectations and our expectations.

But what do we really? God expect of men who wait for him? They expect clear answers. They expect God out among others and promote life by allowing them a better life than what society holds. They expect God upsets their daily reality by putting before them a hope concrete. Since the days of John Baptist, we expect the same thing, but today's reality seems no more obvious than the reality of the past. However, Jean Baptist seemed sure of himself!

He had felt the change coming from afar as hoped. He had found the ad in the speeches of the prophets of old, whose message was preserved in the Scriptures. He had given up everything for God to lend her voice to repeat their message of old who had retained its relevance. This message was that the crowds as they waited rushed en masse in the desert places to listen, as it is true that men like to be pushed around by the provocative lyrics. The eloquence of John the Baptist denounced their sins, displayed in public their forfeitures. She was accompanied at the same time acts of purification. Hope gtandissait.

Messiah could therefore come. Never had he not acknowledged in this man from his own family who had come to submerge him in the desert ? Since he began his career as a preacher like him, and he worked miracles.

Now John was expecting his death in jail without any proof that it came from God. Despite promises that reached him from outside, he remained trapped and forgotten. The tyrant was still in power and despite the fine words of Jesus nothing new happening really. The change announced was done in continuity. Suffice to say that there was no real change. There were individual conversions but the grip of the world by God was always not visible.

Since ancient times, the presence of God still does not seem visible. Jesus preached a gospel with words, according to many, are revolutionary, but nothing has changed. Like John, Jesus died a martyr! Nothing will change, however. resurrection proclaimed by so many believers seem to have changed great thing difference. Is there then something that we do not understand?

Whether looking crowds by going to the desert to be baptized? Hoping they change the behavior of God by engaging in acts of mass conversion? In fact, man can change God? Without doubt they all thought they could put pressure on God through their acts of repentance that God decides to change society. They hoped that God would do the job for them!

John in prison must have thought his life was a failure and that his faith in Jesus was a decoy! It is also still believe that today, those who rank among philosophers and Jesus that make him a sage inspired by refusing to believe it is as a witness of God which he spoke and he acted. That is why Jesus said that John was the greatest of the prophets. John had seen that it is the heart of men who would become if they wanted to see change take place on God's side, because it is God that men must draw the noble ideas that will help them change the world. These ideas they find in the words of Jesus. The ability to achieve them given by the Spirit of God that keeps blowing each of us.

ago in the heart of every human capital of generosity that asks express themselves and be valued. But this business can be successful only if God is the guarantor. While men try to change things without trying to be guided by God, turn their business to fail. Jesus' answer to John the Baptist confirms this intuition. He said in essence that is the voice of God that he heard through the prophets and it is God who guided him to act as he did. But it is not God who took him in prison is the hard law of man, and if he dies it will not God's plan. But in no way his business has been a failure.

Each generation of youth has it not acted as Jean Baptiste? Every era has seen the rise of young people to ideas generous, willing to change the world. They have always loved to dress differently from people who around them, so for them the clothing of camel's hair Jean became the leather jacket or shirt with flowers. Their food itself was different from that of their parents as honey and grasshoppers were for the I year which became their predecessor on the path of protest and generosity.

Their vehement protests were consistent with John. Then disappointed with the lack of following in their case they lock themselves in their own prison good society they join wondering why their ideas have not made better off. The question they should and they have yet ask is the same as that of John. Where was God in their business?

To all those who dream of changing the world, Jesus brings a response that reject much. Change begins with changing oneself by descent our strong inside to meet with God who will no doubt place our pride, our selfishness, not re lack of love.

This questioning of ourselves invariably leads us to discover God in another aspect. His love changes our view of things and if our noble ideas are not implemented, they are not necessarily a sign of failure. This is the effect of hardness of heart of people among whom God is asking us to make the contradiction is the basis on which he builds his Kingdom. This we must do now with self denial Instrument and love for others as raw material.

This confirms the great hope gushing tales of Christmas. Join the mages that we talked about starting this. The story of their adventure, which has survived largely legendary. It was forged by generations of believers whose Gospel of Matthew has retained a small part. It has made them kings, who have abandoned their wealth to leave very happy, relieved of their power, to another destiny. God has guided men in the night by a star that is still being sought. This same star that will lead us all to abandon himself to his fate build and build with God's kingdom comes.

Fotos De La Displecia

NATO Summit in Lisbon: Turkey confirms its room for maneuver within NATO.


By early this week, the main Turkish political leaders welcomed the outcomes of the summit NATO, which was held on November 19 and 20 2010, in Lisbon. The main object of their appreciation for the missile shield and the fact that the summit has decided, according to what they wanted, not specifically mentioned Iran as a threat justifying that this defense system is extended to the Europe (see our issue of November 19, 2010). The summit was eventually simply stated: "NATO does not consider any country as an enemy. However, nobody should doubt his determination, if the security of any of its member states were to be threatened. "On 20 November, the President of the Republic, Abdullah Gul, who warned yesterday that Turkey could not "be in a project that targets a specific country," said that "Strategic Concept" was "within expectations" of Turkey. As expected Ankara has been successful, because given the good relations it will maintain with its neighbors, including Iran and Syria, for whom, number of member countries Alliance, nourish the utmost suspicion, she did not want the threats for the shield is expressly designated.

If we look deeper into the issue BMD, and the atmosphere that preceded the Lisbon summit, one can not fail to note that the issues, raised by this new concept, reflect the special position is currently that of Turkey on the international stage. Indeed, Western countries have made no secret of the reasons that motivate them to extend this defense system to Europe. Primus inter pares, the United States has often openly designated Iran as the subject of concern particularly focusing on the risks posed by a threat of small but they feel real, consisting the proliferation of missiles at medium and short ranges, the gates of Europe. At their summit in Lisbon, November 20, 2010, Nicolas Sarkozy, France, was very explicit about this, saying: "The threat is Iran! "It is true that to secure their position, Turkish diplomats had already warned that they would meet in the absence of countries cited as threat in" strategic concept "defining the shield, and once granted anonymity potential threats in the text, the statements of each other would have no value for their country. It remains that despite this victory words, if the shield is designed to protect property from countries like Iran, if Russia is required to participate in this defense system, Turkey will find themselves only Muslim country in defense project includes mainly the two former Cold War blocs and conforming in many respects, border clash of civilizations.

only downside to this scenario, we know that the Russian participation in the shield, announced to great fanfare of trumpets by NATO after the summit, is far from certain. Lisbon has shown that despite a approximation, differences of view persist significant between NATO and Russia. In accepting the dialogue and does not formally oppose the shield, the Russians have avoided the latter appears as mostly turned against them, and have been directed mainly towards the Muslim world, which can In addition to Turkey in an uncomfortable situation with respect to its neighbors, some of which, even if they are not mentioned, may feel targeted. If, however, caution against Russian shield is confirmed, the situation in Turkey is not as comfortable as The shield would then remain a Western project leaving more uncertain threats which he intends to protect. Ankara would be reached, such as Moscow, in a sense, to preserve its relationship with the West without engaging with them too.
JM

Infinite Credits In Poptropica

Turkey were vindicated when the NATO summit in Lisbon on the missile shield.


The Turkish press says, these days, that Turkey were vindicated during the NATO summit, held in Lisbon on 19 and 20 November: the missile shield that must be put in place to protect the European territory does not specifically designate Iran as a potential threat. For several weeks, Ankara expressing strong reservations about this project, hoping it developed under the auspices of NATO, not only the United States of America, and that all members of the Alliance could benefit . But it was the idea that the concept paper, extending this initiative to the defense of European territory, to designate targets, which worries the Turkish diplomacy.

The BMD is actually the latest in a long series of U.S. plans to protect U.S. (or allies) of an attack by intercontinental missiles. Initiated in the 1950s at the height of the Cold War, this idea has been regularly adapted to changing the threat or the supposed Soviet threat. In the early 1980s, Ronald Reagan revived, very media, with the famous SDI (SDI), better known then as the "Star Wars". After the end of the Cold War, the operation seemed to lose its raison d'etre. Yet, the fear of an attack much more limited arrival of Eurasia (especially North Korea or Iran) that has justified past ten years, reviving the debate on the subject and the development of a new defense system that President Obama has sought to extend to Europe, given the risk posed by the proliferation of missiles Short and medium range. This system is however smaller than those developed at the end of the bipolar world, in addition to the arsenal (networks of radars and interceptor missiles), which must be implemented, is on the ground and not in the space.

Even though it has developed an ambitious three-year policy of good neighborhood and has ceased to pose as mediating power, Turkey fears that the missile shield is in place in a delicate position with respect to its neighbors or countries with which it maintains a growing cooperation in the economic and political. The a priori unfavorable manifested What China and Russia against the shield in Ankara have confirmed the prejudices they might have. But the fact that the U.S. had given pledges to these powers to make them understand that they were not covered by the project, was not totally reassured Turkey. For, even as Russia participates At the Lisbon summit to see how his own defense system could be connected to the missile shield, it is in fact became even clearer that the main target of the latter is constituted by "rogue states" of Eurasia, with a limited arsenal that would by no less a threat. But the idea that the document to be adopted by NATO during the summit in Lisbon, can directly designate the Islamic Republic as a threat to Turkey appears untenable, just as she has just withdrawn from Tehran the list of countries that constitute a threat, and included in its official policy document ("document of national security").

In recent weeks, the non-referral of Iran as a threat, has become an absolute requirement for Ankara, conditioning his final signature. It seems that the United States and NATO members have agreed not to designate any country a threat in the document to be endorsed in Lisbon. If such information is confirmed, it will show that Turkey acquires a more specific within the Alliance, which allows him to live a logical defense interests integrated with new and more specific regional power.
JM

How To Give A Male Physical Genital

preaching of John the Baptist Sunday, December 5, 2010 Matthew 24:37-44

Matthew 3 :1-12.

Preaching of John the Baptist

1 In those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the Judean desert. 2 He said: Repent for the kingdom of heaven is near. 3 He whom the prophet Isaiah said: is the voice of one crying in the wilderness Prepare the way the Lord make his paths straight.

4 John was clothed with camel's hair and a leather belt around his waist. He ate locusts and wild honey. 5 The inhabitants of Jerusalem, throughout Judea and the whole region of Jordan, came to him, 6 and they were baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins.

7 As he saw coming for baptism many Pharisees and Sadducees, he said: O generation of vipers, who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 therefore fruits worthy of repentance; 9 and can not imagine being able to say 'We have Abraham as our father! For I declare to you that these stones God can raise up children to Abraham. 10 The ax is already at the root of the trees: therefore every tree which does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. January 1 me, I baptize you with water for repentance, but He that cometh after me is mightier than I, and I do not deserve to bear sandals. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. February 1 His winnowing by hand to clear his area, he will gather his wheat into the barn, but he will burn the chaff with unquenchable fire not.

See also Isaiah 11/1-10,

"Prepare the way the Lord, make his paths straight "

Taking over from the voice of Isaiah, John the Baptist crying in turn. That sounds like a long lament that echo echo through the Scriptures to proclaim the wrath of God upon his rebellious people. This is a people stiff neck, it is slow to understand and to believe, he is unable to repent. How many preachers before me did not they wanted to turn over this cry for the rehabilitation of walking, slumbering churches, parishes comfortably installed in their habits and cause a surge in her wake?

As John the Baptist, how many preachers feel they not mandated by God to lecturing his people and bring his sheep to the fold? Great preachers of all time do not hesitate to fulminate against the apathy of believers who use religion instead of living the precarious faith!

Os ERAI I now follow suit and imitate them by using the powers that many others before me have been appropriate? This would first be discourteous for me and the other would not, I think will happen to the gospel itself, and that's what I'll try to explain. Yet these sermons that are described as muscular does not ineffective. The Gospel shows us the day crowds rushing into the desert to be scolded by John the Baptist, and even today it is a style used by some preachers who promise to disaster infidels and doing a full house. Such a process undoubtedly provides some profitability to their community. But if such sermons are successful sects they can not make the success of the gospel because churches do not find his account. It is made of sweetness and love and not of invective and admonition.

So you say, why and why not John the Baptist preachers today?

For one good reason is that, from John the Baptist, God's revelation was part of another discourse. Under the leadership of Jesus, the type of relationship with God was presented in another way. We went from Law to Grace. Jean Baptiste ends with the ultimate attempt to bring a preacher men to faith announcing the wrath of God Almighty offended by human sin: "stop being disobedient to God tell them it without What God can not continue to be your God, and you surely die. "

After John the Baptist, Jesus propose another challenge. change is no longer looking at the man who refuses, but the way of relating to God that will change. God agrees to join the men in their concerns, he even agreed to go through the death to join them. Not that God has changed, it remains unchanged. The prophets had tried once to put it another way, but they were not listened to. It took all the persuasion of Jesus so that things do change.

So one last time, Jean Baptiste sounded the voice of God's wrath. he thunders against everything that obstructs its majesty, he castigated the clergy, he admonishes sinners, all are condemned. But it is a form of symbolic gesture.

Jesus we will propose look God in another way. From now on things will start to change very quickly. It only takes just 3 short years that everything was foreseen and foretold by the prophets before him took shape. For the prophets, as Isaiah himself had understood perfectly. He sensed that God prepared would slow revolution in the human heart, and a change of attitude on the part of God, should occur. It is from the change of God that men would change.

A conversion was necessary. It was a double Conversion: Conversion of God and conversion of men. Conversion of God was to no longer appear in his majesty as the master of everything and the creator of everything. God gave up his absolute power and would wait outside, the man recognized in another aspect. God then appears in the guise of one who is compassionate and that can not be recognized by the manifestation of his love. As for man, his conversion was now no longer fear the wrath of God and not to seek the visible acts of his omnipotence, but to recognize acts of love that change the behavior of men between them.

Love will become the common point of encounter between God and man. It is by sharing it they will recognize one or the other. By love, God introduced man in his sovereignty and his eternity and love, man gives up everything that attaches to the vanity and agrees to share God's eternity.

This has been happening since 2000. Years. God has consistently expressed its legitimate anger and began to abandon the trappings of his divinity. The fire promised by the prophets to destroy Humanity, like fire falling from the sky to destroy the infidels became the fire of the Spirit, which falls man, penetrates to the innermost parts and lights in his desire to s unite to his God in an act of eternal love. The man then completes its journey to earth in an osmosis of love with God.

Thus prepares Christmas. The divine is human. God renounces himself and his divinity and became man. In Jesus there in between fully self-surrender by demonstrating the limitless love he feels for every human. Then parading before him, prostitutes, children, old people, scribes, Pharisees, soldiers, publicans, Jews, Samaritans, Gentiles, rich, poor, disabled and even dead. All found in the same loving relationship, a sense of equality. The sin ceases to be an element of rupture between God and man.

To accomplish when his term of humanity. God accepts the death, cessation Supreme himself. He then meets his ultimate humanity destiny. She finds herself transformed by the divine visit. Nothingness can not resist, and nothing is forever. Then the man can say saved. He is saved when he begins to believe that this is true.

Sony Dvp Sr 200 P Auregion Free

YouTube authorized then again banned in Turkey ...


An Ankara court had lifted on 30 October, the proscription imposed on You Tube in Turkey. The popular platform for sharing videos had been banned in September 2007 by a court of Sivas, following a complaint clips deemed insulting to the memory of Mustafa Kemal. However, the latter having been removed from the portal which had published the Turkish courts had therefore lifted a ban, often denounced by the European authorities and even by some official authorities Turkish, starting with the president himself, who wished on several occasions, the end of a situation that brings Turkey countries considered enemies of the Internet.


Indeed, without formally placed Turkey on the list of the 10 Internet enemies countries (Saudi Arabia, Burma, North Korea, Cuba, Egypt, Iran, Uzbekistan, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Vietnam) "Reporters Without Borders has for the first time in 2010, appearing on the" countries under surveillance "in the company of Australia, Belarus, UAE, South Korea, Russia and Thailand. The RSF report made particular note: "In Turkey, about taboos revolve mainly around Atatürk, the military, the question of minorities (Kurds and Armenians in particular) and the dignity of the nation. As such, several thousands of sites are blocked, including YouTube, sparking protests. Bloggers and netizens who express themselves freely on these subjects are exposed to reprisals, including the courts. "


On 1 November, the OSCE representative for Freedom, Duja Mijatovic, hailed the reopening of You tube in Turkey, while calling lifting the bans that still weigh on other sites. Unfortunately, since November 3, YouTube is banned again. At issue this time broadcast from the famous video showing the former CHP leader Deniz Baykal in a compromising position with one of the deputies of his party, a document whose distribution on the Internet had led to the resignation of the leader Kemalist last May, which is outlawed by the Turkish courts since ... For this one, display the privacy of Deniz Baykal is as serious as violations of the cult of Mustafa Kemal jurisprudence ... to think ...

Joking, maintaining the ban is particularly shocking in a country where there is yet an abundance of media of any kind, relatively free (TV, radio, newspapers, magazines ...) in any case much higher than in Belarus or Egypt (when You Tube is also available). So far this situation seemed to be the result of particularly rigid interpretation made by some judges obtuse laws protecting the national honor or integrity of certain dogmas and taboos. In October 2008 a decision of the First Criminal Division of Diyarbakır, dated October 20 2008, referenced under number 2008/2761, targeting Kurdish sites, had earned a ban on the broadcast platform Blogs Google "Blogspot". Following widespread protests, which were then expressed against the blocking of the largest global platform of blogs, the ban was eventually lasted three days, but we remember it was a private time our Turkish readers their favorite blog (see our October 28, 2008 edition)!

This new episode of the ban on YouTube shows that the issue of full freedom of consultation and free Internet usage in Turkey is still valid. Too bad!
JM

Can Decidual Bleeding Affect A Pregnancy Test

Early departure of President Diyanet. Report


The chairman of Diyanet (Diyanet Isleri Baskanligi, Directorate of Religious Affairs), Ali Bardakoğlu (right in photo), resigned November 10 last, two months before the expiry of his mandate. He held the post since 2003, and was finishing his second term. Officially, this departure was made at the request of the interested party before a restructuring of the institution is Görmez Mehmet (left in photo), who served as vice president so far, succeeded Bardakoğlu, while the minister in charge of worship, Faruk Celik said that the replacement was taken in the context of reforms which the institution must be the subject soon, and assured that the person of the incumbent president and his actions were not question.

Yet many observers believe that this sudden departure was the result of political pressure more than the imperatives of personal convenience. I must say it comes at a time when the Islamic headscarf dispute continues to bounce in Turkey. Earlier this academic year, the YOK (Higher Education Council) asked the teacher not to exclude from his classes, students wearing the headscarf, an initiative that has reopened a controversy latent secular circles, noting that the veil is still officially banned on campus because of a jurisprudence the Constitutional Court confirmed in 2008. Moreover, even though the debate on the headscarf in universities has also raged during the campaign for the referendum of 12 September the Prime Minister has recently proposed that the matter be decided by the Diyanet. Ali Bardakoğlu but refused to take that responsibility by calling on politicians to solve this problem through dialogue. Although Diyanet depends on the prime minister, his ex-president said also that his institution should not act upon the request of political power, and explained that wearing the headscarf should be regarded as a personal choice, not allowing not to assume the convictions of those who wore or did not wear it.

Ali Bardakoğlu is also known to have approved the removal of the mention of religion, which appeared earlier on Turkish identity cards, and was hostile to say two reforms that the government has placed under review: the diffusion of the Friday sermon in Kurdish and the representation of Alevis in the Diyanet. More recently, the departing president has noted, saying the Kemalist daily "Cumhuriyet" Atatürk was the head of state who had brought the most attention in Diyanet and not participating in the single reception Organized this year by the President on the occasion of National Day.

Thus the departure of Bardakoğlu explained by the shift more and more important, between designing administrative and therefore not enough spiritual personality is the Diyanet, thus perpetuating the Kemalist tradition, on the one hand, and a desire to see government instead commit the institution more clearly on issues related to lifestyle and social issues, on the other .

Actor fundamental Turkish secularism, the Diyanet is responsible for managing a real Islamic state. It controls such as training, appointment of imams, and sermons, fixed religious holidays and manages the mosques. Directly attached to the Prime Minister, this institution is allocated the 7th state budget and organizes Turkish Islam abroad. Yet, the President of Diyanet has always refused to play a spiritual role involving notably that constantly launches fatwas tone moral, social and even political, just as can the Sheikh of Al Azhar, Egypt . It has thus increasingly seen as a senior manager of the majority religion than a religious leader to speak of.

At a time when Turkey is undergoing a profound transformation of power relations within its political system (down the army, the judicial hierarchy, hierarchy secular university ...), the departure of Ali Bardakoğlu he anticipates a mutation of the place and role of Diyanet?
JM

Nodule Inside Of Nose

halftone of the European Commission on the progress of Turkey's candidacy.


The European Commission issued a report yet another annual evaluation of Turkey's candidacy to the EU in halftone, November 9 last. On the political front, the report notes that since the end of 2009, the news has been dominated by constitutional reform, the opening Kurdish and the multiple trials that are primarily the military hierarchy. This does not prevent him from engaging in a careful analysis of the human rights situation in that country.

Regarding the constitutional amendment adopted September 12, 2010 by referendum, "Turkey Progress Report 2010" reiterates the view expressed to him that had the European Commission proposed changes "are going in the right direction" and "address the priorities outlined in the Accession Partnership." The report concludes that changing the compositions of the Constitutional Court and the HSYK (Hakimler ve Yüksek Kurulu Savcılar - Supreme Council of Judges and Prosecutors, the equivalent of the Supreme Council of Magistracy in France) and the submission of decisions military tribunals to the ordinary courts are "not positive". However, noting that the Presidency of HSYK it now comes only to the minister of justice, he stressed the need to implement reforms, "according to European standards and following a path open, transparent and consensual." The report also regrets on several occasions that the constitutional reform has not been wider consultation of political parties and civil society.

Regarding the Kurdish question, while the report acknowledges the efforts that have expanded the possibilities of use Kurdish and Arabic languages in the south-east and increasing regional investment under the GAP (Güney Anadolu Projesi, Project Southeastern Anatolia is: operation planning conducted by the Turkish government, relaxing to first on the corresponding development of hydropower and irrigation), he regretted that "the measures announced as part of the democratic opening have been below expectations and have not been finally acted upon concrete . Are also singled out: the dissolution of the DTP (Kurdish parliamentary party since replaced by BDP) in December 2009, the massive roundup of members of KCK (Kurdish organization suspected by Turkish authorities to be an urban branch of the PKK) that followed, the maintenance of minefields and the system of village guards, and the particularly deadly armed clashes with the PKK, which resumed in 2010. The report recommends a reduction of the exceptional nature of anti-terrorism as well as reduced arrests under this legislation.

If the report highlights the results achieved in the fight against corruption and observe the legislative efforts and regulatory that improved gender equality, children's rights or the rights of employees, it also focuses on maintaining a number of shocking situations including on women's rights (honor killings, forced marriages ... ) or stigmatization of homosexuals (recent homophobic remarks of the minister in charge of women and family or military regulation that continues to describe homosexuality as illness).

The "Progress Report 2010", moreover, while observing the improvements resulting from the law on religious foundations in 2008, believes that the situation of non-Muslim minorities remains concern. In particular, there is little change in the fate of the Greek Orthodox minority and notes that the trial of the killers of Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, "continues without significant progress" for over 3 years.

Regarding the multiple conspiracy cases, the report is less optimistic than in previous years. He mentions several investigations and trials (Balyoz, Ergenekon, Cage, Erzincan ...). He believes that this process may allow Turkey to strengthen the credibility of its democratic institutions and the rule of law. But he insists repeatedly the imperative to respect the rights of those arrested or implicated, and are of significant deficiencies of the criminal proceedings in this regard.

Among the observations made tougher by the European Commission, on the occasion of this annual assessment are those concerning the Cyprus conflict. The 2010 report noted that Turkey still does not obligations of non-discrimination and full opening of trade flows with respect to Cyprus, arising from the customs union agreement and its Additional Protocol. We know that not opening the ports and Turkish airports to the Republic of Cyprus freeze eight chapters of accession negotiations since 2006. In its 2010 report, the European Commission slams maintaining the status quo in the matter, as does the lack of improvement of bilateral relations between Turkey and Cyprus.

In many ways this report may seem similar to those of previous years (see our edition of October 26, 2009), marked by a very ambivalent about. Beyond the technical evaluation of various aspects of the status of Turkey's application, we note that the Commission is concerned many "climate of political confrontation ambient characterized by a lack of dialogue and compromise." In this respect, reconciliation efforts of the President of the Republic are greeted again, whereas if the government's initiatives to revive reforms necessary for European integration of Turkey are reported, while being regarded as "limited."

However it is regrettable that the political analysis of the Commission does not go a bit further than this appeal to consensus and that it does not try to understand the changing balance policies that are underway, in particular, the decline of the army (very weak output of the last YAS), divisions of the judiciary, changes in the academic hierarchy (increasingly gained AKP), the transformations underway in the field of press and media (scheduled disappearance Doğan group in particular) or mutations of Turkish diplomacy. It is true that the essence of such a report is to stick to the conditions of accession and the responses that are made each year by the candidate. This method is strictly adhered to in Part 4 of the report, which describes the ability of the acquis Community, chapter by chapter, this is understandable. However, the second part of the report (dedicated to "political criteria") might give way to a more open policy analysis and strategic. Otherwise the Commission may be doomed to repeat every year, this age-old speech stating that Turkey has not fallen but it can do better. This approach ultimately leads to the impression that nothing changes in Turkey, even though political change (decline of the army and the judicial hierarchy), economic (spectacular results the Turkish economy in recent months) and diplomatic (new foreign policy) are major ongoing since 2007. These mutations do not necessarily assume, moreover, the ability of Turkey to join the European Union, but without doubt it would be interesting to approach them with greater boldness and in a more forward looking.
JM