Do People That Are Hung Wet Themselves?

Building on the rock or sand on Sunday, March 6, 2011

Matthew 7/21-27 21

Whoever said, 'Lord, Lord! Will not necessarily in the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to me that day, Lord, Lord! Is it not in your name we prophesied in your name we cast out demons in thy name we have done many miracles? 23 Then I will declare to them I've never known you remove it from me you evildoers.

24 Thus, everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on rock. 25 The rain fell and the floods came, the winds blew and brought to this house: it did not fall, because it was based on the rock. 26 But everyone who hears these words of mine, and do not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house upon the sand. 27 The rain fell, the floods came, the winds blew and were slaughtered on that house, it fell and great was its fall.

there was the subject of the sermon that you do not like. Indeed, we used to say that the Gospel is good news, and we are right, but this text does not appear to contain good news. It suggests that among the best among us, some will not have the chance to enter the kingdom of God. This is not necessarily the one who prays, or lip service that says, this is not even necessarily the one who performs miracles that will enter the kingdom of God, it is said here.

After hearing this, listeners will probably say, "Preacher, this is for you that these words were said, hush, do not you see that you speak for yourself, you who see miracles here where there is perhaps no, you who make profession of preacher in the name of God and lead others to pray, do not you see that you are ineffective in this world that you do not understand. Shut up because you are the first concerned by the warning of this exhortation. Is therefore your sleeves, put you to work and try to act so that men stop their games that lead to death.

you can imagine, the preacher that I had already pondered such invective for several days and he will not venture to give a sermon on this subject without having provided his rear. However we must realize that not only he who is described in these words of Jesus is also the Church as a whole and the preacher would tend to say to all those who listen " if you see that our Church has not the strength that we want is that you do not do what it takes, therefore fear the ruling. "

If I wanted those words, much of the audience would leave the meeting forthwith, the remainder would remain very small or even become nonexistent. Soon, others, probably the sound of the rumor would join preacher in disgrace and would build with him, naturally a lucrative cult, based on the anathema of Christians warm he would become the guru. It would be from the fear of Judgement which will soon destroy this wicked world collapsing into sin, the filth and immorality, but they are not here to conform to the gospel about which I will remember is always good news.

It seems here that Jesus wants us to live by these provocative lyrics. He tries to tell us that the Christian faith, for all of the individual and not just one aspect of it. Faith is not just the soul while the rest could be independent. It is not a decoration that would act nicely on our soul when we were in the process of depression. Faith is an inner impulse of our being that permeates all our individual and, from inside invaded all the deep structures of our personality.

To illustrate his point, Jesus takes an example, in an area where he is a connoisseur. He is a carpenter, ie someone working on the beams. It will therefore speak construction of a house. He knows from experience that the frame of a house can be excellent, but the solidity of the house depends on its deep structure, that is not seen but whose absence proves catastrophic when the elements involving the rec destruction. These foundations whose existence largely determines the strength of the building. It is preferable therefore to build on rock, although it must make more effort if we build on sand.

The purpose of Jesus is therefore concern that does not show. For what is seen is not decisive in his eyes. While this connection is relevant, we know in advance that in our churches when we focus even more on what is seen. Is the external structure of our buildings that motivates our long debates, more than the inner health of our communities. The outward manifestation of piety of an individual or the appearance of a community do not matter and does not reveal its deep structure. That's what's inside that makes the value.

Everything outside that is causing us concern will matter only if that does not show is firmly rooted in the will of God, ie "intelligent listening" to his word. If I say "intelligent listening" is that there is a listening that is not. Listening is smart to let themselves be challenged by what's new and causing the Word of God and receive it with gratitude even if we do not want to hear.

In contrast, there are also listening "unintelligent", which is more appealing to our sensitivity to our intellect, which is to only listen to God's words that go in the direction of our thinking, which flatter our convictions and we therefore confirm our positions. This is fostered by listening unintelligent unintelligent and therefore a sermon by a preacher unintelligent who knows in advance what's good to hear and twist the meaning of the Gospel to make it say what we want to hear. It is a preacher who attaches more importance to the outside and not inside edify his audience.

You realize that I'm going against the grain of normal demand of our contemporaries who seek a gospel adapted to their wishes, simple enough to be understood by people hurry than we are, a gospel that requires little effort to be understood. That would be to sell out the gospel with it to find immediate success. The world needs spirituality, thinks it sometimes, "we give him and he will get better! . Well no! We can not offer any spirituality, but spirituality intelligent, meaning that requires a process of reflection.

Today's Gospel encourages us to work and make a personal and collective effort at what is not seen to get to the bottom of ourselves and meet God awaits us. It proposes to build the foundations of our faith, consolidate and provide rigor to our beliefs, as long as we accept that God is on our side. All this is not the visible world it is a dynamic depth that Jesus is stimulated. It requires work and intelligence.

Called by Jesus to be with her faith builders, we need not fear the provocations and the disasters that can push us around. If Jesus' words are harsh, not to send us into a hell that men have invented but that God has not created for us is that the appearance of faith are not faith and lead nowhere. They will be of no help if they are not firmly anchored on a constant and daily companionship with the one that drives our faith, namely Jesus Christ.

Jesus Christ dwells in the depths of your being, it provokes us to keep our professional life, emotional and spiritual is always seen in his company. If Jesus is our life from God, we must accept that our lives are directed by him. We accept that challenge to our projects. We need to stress on ourselves and also an effort in our community to identify, understand and act in faithfulness

Join Us To Celebrate Farwell

Réalité Russe du nord ... So whether

This little message to signal the appearance on the canvas of a new blog that deals with the Russian reality, far from the cliches and stereotypes.

blog Reality Russian wants a living testimony of what Russia today, with the eyes of foreigners. In pictures, but also videos .. Look it

here

What Is The Peace Sign On Its Side Mean?

The NCCD is funded by Zionism?

Some in Algeria to Boutefligha, Democrats have embarked on a major event February 12, 2011. This movement was suppressed with the methods of the French police.

The Yankees have called this Sunday, February 13 Algerian forces of repression to "hold" means that which has not been done against the Egyptian protesters, until Mubarak assured the coup by Souleymane. At that time, the Jewish Zionists and the Yankees have openly called for the army to "ensure the safety of protesters."

The thinly veiled threat follows the pseudo-event organized by the RCD on Saturday, called by many Shabbat RCD. Because the head of the organization occult RCD is a loyal friend of the Jewish Zionists and Yankees. It may even be an aid program by USAID to "DEMONcratiser" Algeria.

In April 2007, while the head of state has rejected the tempting offers for U.S. military bases and NATO on its territory, the ambassador states Americans in Algiers warned the threat of terrorist attacks in the capital.

The statement Crowly spokesman said: "We take note of current events in Algeria and called for restraint by the security forces." It is these kinds of perverts, murderers and rapists that call for restraint? It's high immorality, debauchery intellectual ... or perhaps the simple perversion. Just look at what they do in Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq or Palestine ... to see these people.

The NCCD (Coordination National Change and Democracy), called in the event of Shabbat 12 February (like the 12 rabbis). You know what I think of their democracy funded by the Jewish Zionists.

As for those who cry foremost democracy or a republic, are idolaters. They combine the Almighty, a political power. It is in this case that the Jewish-Zionist secular response would convert us all to their idolatry. The NCCD

wants to revive a demonstration this Saturday. It's amazing that this is done on a Saturday, while in Tunisia, and Egypt, and Yemen, full of demonstrators is important on Friday, while the NCCD is full on Saturday ... on the Sabbath.

Zionization Other evidence of the NCCD, it is Sarkozy's calls to leave NCCD manifest. It is therefore an occult organization funded by the Zionists to take power in Algeria, as they did in Tunisia, Morocco and other countries, as elsewhere in India.

For over 11 years, terrorism is essentially the potentially rich country like Algeria, Ivory Coast, Mali, Niger, Afghanistan, Sudan, Somalia ... etc. It is a game of the Western, with their lead the Yankees and the Zionists.

We are entitled to fight these terrorists, armed, financed and organized by NATO and the Western ... complement

A revolution yes, but as soon as it is to transfer control of the Jewish population -Zionist, I am against it. In Algeria, for example, all democracies controlled by the Jewish Zionists have expressed their support for the NCCD, while in Tunisia, they were against the people, and Egypt, they did much worse against the brothers.

Today, the only resistance are neither Christians nor Jews, neither atheists nor Democrats, or others ... They are Muslims, and they are dying by the thousands to freedom of peoples and the complete cessation of that rampant globalization. Liberal totalitarianism ruled by the Talmud is a program of killing people free.

Just look at what we suffer here in France and Europe. We are drowning in taxes, taxes and deficits, debts and other inflations.

Does It Hurt Dogs When There Testicals Drop

Turkey, Iran, Egypt: shared interests and contradictions


President Abdullah Gul began Monday, February 14 an official visit of four days in Iran, the head of a strong ministerial delegation and Turkish businessmen. The objective is the signing of new agreements for cooperation and economic policy. This move, which comes in both the "new Turkish diplomacy" of the Foreign Minister, Ahmet Davutoğlu, and in a long series of bilateral reciprocal travel, confirms the continued strengthening of Turkish-Iranian relations since 2007. One of the most spectacular episodes was, May 17, 2010, signed in Tehran by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, President Lula da Silva of Brazil, and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, an agreement Tripartite enrichment of Iranian uranium (see our editions of 24, 26 and 29 May and 12 June 2010). On the eve of the presentation to the Security Council of a fourth package of sanctions against Iran, the tripartite agreement had caused great irritation of the United States, the European Union and NATO. But, in fact, many economic agreements concluded in recent years in the fields of industry, commerce, transport infrastructure, services, and especially energy (especially gas), weigh more heavy volume and value in the balance of payments and trade of both countries, one-Iran-is nevertheless subject to an embargo and sanctions the international community.

Some observers were surprised at the continuation of Feb. 14 to begin an official visit to Iran. Because President Gul arrived in Tehran in full voltage domestic policy related to the impact of Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. Two events at the same goal-affirming support of the Iranian people's movement in Egypt were held to-day interval, including one on Monday 14 February. With opposite intentions clearly.

Friday, February 11 (the day Mubarak is gone), as part of official celebrations of the 32nd anniversary of the Republic Islamic regime in Tehran organized as it knows how, on the square Azadi (Freedom), a large demonstration in support of "the just struggle of Arab peoples ... for the establishment of Islamic regimes, anti- US and anti-Zionists ": the many demonstrators, especially of popular origin, were organized in groups on their places of work or in their neighborhoods, heavily equipped with banners and slogans, and brought on site by water wheels buses.

Monday, February 14 (or 25 Bahman), opposition to the plan (the Green movement around the former presidential candidate in 2009 Mir Hossein Moussavi) has called for demonstrations to "support the Arab peoples in struggle ... for democracy, "as the Iranians two years ago. "Everything we're seeing in the streets of Tunis, Sana'a, Cairo, Alexandria and Suez has its origins in the events that are produced in Iran in June 2009. Millions of Iranians were then taken to the streets to ask 'Where is my vote? " and demanded their rights peacefully. "affirmed Mr. Mousavi early February. In Tehran, an official request had been filed with the authorities under section 27 of the Constitution on the freedom of demonstration, opposition heard play the card of legality and non-violence, and mobilize young people on the internet and blogs, mobile and Twitter. The slogans have left no doubt about the mood of the demonstrators: "Down with the Dictator! [Guide] or: "Mubarak, Ben Ali, and now Seyyed Ali [Khamenei]." They were in Tehran and in major cities, the first street demonstrations against the regime since February 11, 2010. The demonstration in Tehran, banned, has been violently suppressed: two dead, dozens injured, hundreds of arrests.

Holding a conference Press late Monday afternoon, along with his Iranian counterpart, Abdullah Gul could not completely avoid the problem of the day: popular demonstrations for democracy-authoritarian regimes in the Arab world and ... in Iran. He therefore stressed, in general, that Turkey supported "the democratic aspirations of the peoples of the region. "

Turkey and Iran had to take a position on the events that shook the Arab world for two months, and their most dramatic consequences in Tunisia and Egypt. We know that the Turkish position was initially wait (see our edition of February 1 2011), before Prime Minister Erdogan not clearly committed on 1 February in a principled support the democratic aspirations (see our edition of 2 and February 5, 2011). While avoiding any direct interference in Egyptian affairs, and put forward a "Turkish model" often mentioned by Western observers as possibly apply to the Arab world (integration of Islamists in parliamentary politics, "demilitarization" political life, cf. our edition of February 12, 2011). But Recep Tayyip Erdogan is in place there is a contradiction discursive democratic aspiration would it be legitimate on the banks of the Nile, and illegitimate the avenues Enqhelâb (the Revolution) and Azadi (Freedom) in Tehran? In June 2009, had already criticized the Turkish prime minister the speed with which he had welcomed the re-election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad ("There is no doubt this is our friend. He was officially declared elected, he received a vote of confidence. "), then challenged by millions of demonstrators throughout Iran. To paraphrase Pascal: "Truth on this side of the Zagros Mountains, beyond error"?

The Islamic Republic has taken a position much faster revolutions Arabs, including the political benefit it could possibly take a popular protest weakening or overthrowing regimes, supported by the United States, having signed peace agreements with Israel. The Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has, in a sermon in Persian and Arabic during the great prayer of Friday, February 4, called for a general uprising of the Muslim peoples. As a model with the Iranian revolution of 1979 and a target of widespread Islamic regimes. Speech repeated by those more millenarian, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who helped fuel the parallels worried facts West between 1979 and 2011 ... Next few years the fall of Saddam Hussein, and thus the disappearance of Iraq as a national power-Arab front against Iran, Mubarak's departure, and a weakening of Egypt increased diplomatic, would gain a new strategic Iran in the region, at a time when Beirut was formed a unity government in which the pro-Iranian Hezbollah has considerable leverage. However, the Iranian regime is clearly caught in a contradiction, calling for mass demonstrations for democracy in the Mashreq, and suppressing popular protests claiming that democracy in Iran. This discourse Iranian official was so far from the concerns of protesters Tahrir Square in Cairo. Ankara and Tehran

strengthen their political and economic relations, a view shared interests: confirmation of Turkey as a regional power player in his policy of "good neighbors" and its dynamic economic opportunity for Iran to release by these economic agreements and intermediation on Turkish nuclear isolation on more than Westerners do not often think. But we must not forget that the two countries, because very active towards the Arab Mashreq, are also found in some form of rivalry several sensitive issues: the fate of Iraq, support for Palestinians (in Gaza for example), and even Lebanon, where Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Recep Tayyip Erdogan have followed a few days apart last fall. Therefore need to closely monitor this rivalry as a regional power whose main issue is the respective influence of the "Turkish model" and the "Iranian model" in the Middle East. But perhaps it will be the democratic aspirations of the peoples of the region which will start between these two models ... Jean-Paul Burdy